Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games

This paper explores predictability of behavior in coordination games with multiple equilibria. In a laboratory experiment we measure subjects’ certainty equivalents for three coordination games and one lottery. Attitudes towards strategic uncertainty in coordination games are related to risk aversion, experience seeking, gender and age. From the distribution of certainty equivalents among participating students we estimate probabilities for successful coordination in a wide range of coordination games. For many games success of coordination is predictable with a reasonable error rate. The best response of a risk neutral player is close to the global-game solution. Comparing choices in coordination games with revealed risk aversion, we estimate subjective probabilities for successful coordination. In games with a low coordination requirement, most subjects underestimate the probability of success. In games with a high coordination requirement, most subjects overestimate this probability. Data indicate that subjects have probabilistic beliefs about success or failure of coordination rather than beliefs about individual behavior of other players. JEL classification: C 72, C 91, D 81, D 84 * For valuable comments, we are indebted to Christian Schade, Andreas Schröder and various seminar participants in Frankfurt, Darmstadt, and Barcelona. All errors remain our responsibility. a Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany, [email protected] b Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, [email protected] c Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Germany, [email protected]